Ever since I realised just what was out there, I’ve been fascinated by the wave of sharing that the web seems to have inspired. Apart from the fact that the web exists at all, it is the openness and sharing that I’ve found to be the most awe inspiring aspect of watching the web develop and grow – everything, but everything on there has been put there by a person (or at least initially) for us to use. Some we pay for but the vast quantity we don’t – or at least not directly.
I’ve wondered what has driven this. I’ve contemplated the world of EFL/ ESOL teachers where I’ve worked, where hand crafted materials and resources, even bought resources, have always been viewed slightly selfishly (in my view) by the teacher ‘I invested the time to make it (or buy it) so why should I share it?’ So what has changed?
I’ve thought of a number of possible reasons, just guesses, but potentially useful to follow up sometime:
- Hard copy resources could get ruined or lost if used by many. It’s easier to save originals of e-materials then people can do what they like with their version/ copy?
- If something is shared further afield it’s less likely to have a direct impact on the ‘competition’. Typical EFL/ ESOL classes can have students moving around between teachers and it can be gutting to find that you have a student saying “I’ve done this before”, especially when it’s your own resource you’re using!
- Innate human desire for wide-reaching acknowledgement/ recognition!
- Some sites require a commitment to exchange, so you are not just using other’s resources.
Today, as part of the H800 course material, I read “What you need to know about OER (Open Educational Resources)” (Daniel, S. 2012), which outlines a noble global effort, lead by UNESCO, to bring OER to organisations internationally. It seeks to operate and gain ‘agreements’ at government levels.
In the article In the State of The Commons (SOCT. 2015) the opening phrases went some way towards explaining some of my questions:
“Collaboration, sharing, and cooperation are a driving force for human evolution”
“We are hardwired for sharing. Harvard professor on evolutionary dynamics Martin Nowak calls it the essential “snuggle for survival” — evidence that sharing is not just a selfless act. Sharing has concurrent and lasting benefits, multiplied for the giver, the receiver, and communities at large.”
The ‘Keepers’ (for want of a better word) of Creative Commons aim for a utopian ideal of an online world that is equal and fair, a lively, diverse and accessible community where positive, unexpected experiences occur. Originally set up to provide a technical and legal framework for shared resources and set up Licensing, the aims have extended beyond the original aim to include supporting collaborative and sharing communities. It seems a logical progression since the collaborators will be using the licences…
Though all this still doesn’t explain the shift in sharing hard copy resources and online. Perhaps is it that the larger pool of resources makes them immediately more useable, if organised well. Or perhaps it is the newness of it that causes need for closer snuggling? If that is the case, it seems to be effective as the article shows steep increase in the uptake of OER:
Image taken from:
Checklands (2017) “Rich Pictures”, Systems.open.ac.uk, [online] Available from: https://stateof.creativecommons.org/2015/ (Accessed 30 March 2017).
Between 2013 – 2014 Weller explored the uptake of OER in a series of three articles. Starting with the bold claim that ‘Openness has won!” he then explores the meaning of openness and what he meant by “it has won”. Some of it seems a bit like back-tracking (especially having read the comments) some of it, to be fair, must simply be part of the fact that this whole area is still very much in its infancy. We genuinely don’t know what’s what, it’s being made up, invented, on a daily basis as it evolves. Weller somehow doesn’t seem to recognise this is STILL early days and at one point in the second article says we are at “tipping point”
In the final article he makes an analogy to an iceberg and divides users into three catagories, with only the first seen (I presume though he doesn’t appear to actually say this):
Primary – main contributors and fully aware of licencing etc
Secondary – main goal is normally teaching. Use CC resources as part of this and contribute occasionally. Partially aware of licencing.
Tertiary – users. Little or not at all aware of licences.
He also mentions David Wiley’s concept of ‘The Dark Reuse”. that is, the users that can’t be monitored or included in data.
There also seems to be a lack of recognition from Weller (possibly a wildly sweeping statement) that the drive by HE for the uptake of OER must be economically driven…an idea to follow up some other time…
For my own part, as a practitioner in both education and marketing, I have used material for music in videos and images for PPTs Word docs and occasionally websites, ideas from places like SlideShare…I own up to being guilty of not always being of the licenses as I should be. Not always clearly recognising the source as I should. It’s not that I’m trying to pretend its mine, it’s often just sheer laziness (or too much multitasking and work overload – a time saving device, in my own defence?). I’m getting better but really do need to be more mindful altogether!
COMPARISON OF SOME OER SITES
As part of the course material I was asked to have a look at a number of OER sites and make some notes. It was a useful and interesting exercise but I have to admit all I kept thinking was : OVERLOAD! So much amazing and interesting stuff out there – I could spend ten lifetimes just getting lost in the OER resources! Quite possibly, the net result will be that I’ll steer clear of any of it, just in case I get too tempted!
Notes from the activity – it is useful to break them down a bit and compare. I found the ways in which educators are using MIT to be of particular interest. It also raised some questions I’d like to come back to and explore later:
TABLE COMPARING FOUR OER SITES
||THINGS OF INTEREST
||It was the first
In 2015 it had 2000+ courses
Made up of extracts of real courses: notes, tests, video
|I like the choices based on Instructional approaches
Educators incorporate elements into own lessons
Educators use the courses to help with curriculum development
|Linked to I Tunes U
Was there before You tube, Facebook…
200 million reach
OCW – open course Ware
|Is there an app?
How is it moderated?
|OPEN LEARNING INITIATIVE
||Aims to address the gap between the drive towards teaching more & more diverse students and the time allocated to do this
||Some alarm bells?:
Anyone who wants to learn or teach can.
Aims to transform HE?
Has only 27 active courses
Promotes active learning techniches.
|Very bold claims made
Unclear how it works to teach – it says set up your own courses but thensays your courses are analysed to be maximised using their instructional design technology. Unclear how this works.
|Is there an app?
How is it moderated?
||Free courses (how many? 100’s or 1000’s?) graded at different levels
||Good, clear and easy to navigate site.
Nice idea having badges (wonder how any actually collect?)
Good telling you how long the courses/ activities are.
Good having TV & Radio if want more ‘casual’ learning.
|I found an interesting course but it was course 3 of 4 and I couldn’t find the others.
The site remembered me – I discovered when I saw a course that looked interesting, clicked and was told had previously completed 5%! Total forgotten….
|Could it somehow link to accredited courses?
Who creates the resources?
Why no app?
|I TUNES U
||Lectures, videos, PDFs, MP£s.
Links for universities and other organisations
|A bit of a warren finding things, but once there easy to download and access.
Haven’t tried on the computer, not sure if its possible?
It looks like a good platform for teachers but organisation must be registered – not sure how complicated that is
|Lesson types rely on students having PDs? Or the school supplying them?
||All devices or only Apple?
Available on computer?
Do organisations moderate own content? How?